Pork Links

Technology & Knowledge - Pork Meat Industry

PUBLICACIONES INTERNACIONALES

What We Know About Feeding Liquid By-Products to Pigs

25 February 2009,

Dr Jerry Shurson of the University of Minnesota talked about the advantages and challenges of liquid feeding at Big Dutchman's 5th International Agents' Meeting in Bremen, Germany in July 2008. He focussed particularly on corn condensed distillers solubles and steep water, liquid co-products from the ethanol industry.


Introduction

Liquid feeding systems have been extensively used for many years to utilize liquid by-products in swine production feeding systems in Western Europe. However, use of this technology has been limited in North America and other regions around the world until recently. The increasing popularity of using liquid feeding systems in North America is being driven by extremely high prices of conventional dry feeds, a tremendous increase in availability and low cost of liquid by-products from biofuels production, and numerous growth performance, health, and animal well-being advantages that liquid feeding systems provide compared to dry feeding systems. In fact, approximately 20 per cent of growing-finishing pigs in Ontario, Canada are fed using liquid feeding systems (SLFA, 2007).

Liquid feeding systems involve computer-controlled feed production and frequent feeding of liquid diets that can be successfully used in all phases of swine production. Typically, liquid diets contain 20 to 30 per cent dry matter. In some liquid feeding systems, partial fermentation of ingredients or diets is allowed to occur, resulting in production of organic acids and proliferation of beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacilus acidophilus (de Lange et al., 2006). One of the most important aspects of using liquid feeding successfully is to ensure that the proper ratio of water:dry matter content and frequency of feeding is achieved for the specific production phases where it is used.


Benefits of Liquid Feeding versus Dry Feeding

There are many advantages of using liquid feeding systems compared to dry feeding in swine production. These include improved nutrient utilization, flexibility and control of feeding programmes, utilization of inexpensive liquid by-products, reduced environmental impact and improved animal performance (Jensen and Mikkelsen, 1998; Russell et al., 1996; Canibe and Jensen, 2003; Brooks et al., 2001; Lawlor et al., 2002). Liquid feeding may also enhance gut health, reduce the need for feed medications and improve animal well-being (Brooks et al., 2001; Canibe and Jensen, 2003).

Feeding liquid diets containing fermented ingredients have resulted in improved growth performance, and reduced mortality and morbidity in nursery and growing-finishing pigs (Geary et al., 1996;1999; Canibe and Jensen, 2003; Scholten et al., 1999). These benefits appear to be due to enhanced nutrient availability, and reduced growth and shedding of pathogenic bacteria such as Yersinia, Salmonella and E. coli due to low pH (Geary et al., 1996;1999; Scholten et al., 1999; van Winsen et al., 2001; Demeckova et al., 2001). Furthermore, pepsin activity is increased due to lower pH resulting in improved protein digestion (Scholten et al., 1999). The presence of lactic acid bacteria and organic acids (lactic acid and butyric acid) in fermented liquid feeds may also have positive effects on digestive and immune functions (Simon et al., 2003; Mroz, 2003).


Challenges of Using Liquid Feeding

Consistency of by-product supply

It is essential to have formal agreements with by-product suppliers to obtain a consistent quantity and quality of by-products being used. This is important because dry feed premixes and supplements are custom formulated for the specific by-products being used in liquid feeds and because switching between some by-products may reduce growth performance due to the need for the pigs digestive system to adapt to the changing nutrient composition when switching between by-products.


High water content of by-products

Many by-products have high moisture (70-90 per cent), low dry matter content. As a result, it is difficult to economically justify transporting liquid by-products long distances due to the high cost per kilo dry matter. Furthermore, the amount of water provided to pigs using liquid feeding is higher than used in conventional dry feeding systems. As a result, manure volume can be increased along with increased humidity and moisture levels in swine facilities.


Variability in nutrient content

Nutrient content of by-products can vary substantially from batch to batch and among sources (Braun and de Lange, 2004). Frequent sampling and nutrient analysis allows for making more precise diet formulation adjustments to avoid feeding excessive or limited amounts of nutrients in liquid feeding systems. Ideally, certificates of quality and nutrient profiles should be obtained from suppliers that guarantee that the by-products are free of contaminants and meet regulatory requirements (Braun and de Lange, 2004).


High salt content of some by-products

Liquid whey and bakery waste can contain significant amounts of salt. Sweet whey is the by-product remaining after the production of soft cheeses, whereas acid whey is produced from the longer duration of pressing for hard cheeses and has a lower pH. Since salt is added to cheese before pressing, the liquid whey remaining can contain as much as 10 per cent salt on a dry matter basis. As a result, pigs should be provided ad libitum access to water in addition to the water contained in liquid feed to avoid salt toxicity. High salt content and low pH of liquid whey can accelerate deterioration of concrete floors and steel feeders and equipment in swine facilties. Similarly, the salt content of some bakery by-products may require reduction or elimination of supplemental salt in the diet formulation and may limit the amount of the by-product used.


Loss of synthetic amino acids during storage of liquid feeds

Research conducted in Denmark showed that about 17 per cent of added synthetic lysine was lost after 24 hours of storage of fermented liquid feed (Pedersen et al., 2002). This loss is likely due to preferential utilization of free amino acids by microbes found in fermented feeds (de Lange et al., 2006). Niven et al. (2006) showed that these losses are primarily due to the presence of coliform bacteria present in liquid feed and that when large amounts of Lactobacillus bacteria are present, very little lysine is lost. Therefore, to minimize loss of synthetic amino acids, they should be added to liquid feeds after stable fermentation is achieved, when liquid feed contains more than 75 mMol lactic acid, or when the pH is less than 4.5 (Braun and de Lange, 2004).


Homogeneity of mixed feed

Braun and de Lange (2004) showed that there were substantial differences in mineral content of feed samples collected at the second or second last valve in the feed line in some commercial farms they surveyed. They noted that unmixing of feed is less of a concern using modern liquid feeding equipment as well as when using higher viscosity liquid by-products such as condensed distillers solubles and corn steep water (by-products of the ethanol industry) to keep mineral particles in suspension longer.

Common By-Products Used in Liquid Feeding Systems

There are a number of liquid by-products produced in the food and biofuels industries that are well suited and economical for use in swine liquid feeding systems. However, some of the challenges of using liquid by-products involve variability in nutrient content, consistency of supply, and close proximity of by-product production to swine farms in order to minimize transportation cost. Braun and de Lange (2004) described and summarized some of the common by-products used in liquid feeding systems. These include those from milk processing (sweet whey, acid whey, butter milk), bakery waste (bread, cookies, crackers, and miscellaneous confectionaries), candy (sugar syrup), brewer’s wet yeast (by-product of beer manufacturing), and liquid by-products from ethanol production (corn condensed distiller’s solubles and corn steep water).

Liquid whey is highly palatable. Acid whey contains about 15 per cent protein, which is highly digestible if it has not been treated with excessive heat. It is also an excellent, highly digestible energy source for young pigs because it contains approximately 60 per cent lactose. However, due to the rapidly declining ability of the pig to effectively digest lactose as it ages, digestive upset can occur in older pigs when it is abruptly included in liquid feed or fed at high dietary levels. The high salt content can result in salt toxicity if additional access to fresh water is not provided.

Buttermilk contains about 30-35 per cent protein and 5-6 per cent fat on a dry matter basis. It is an excellent by-product to use in liquid feeding systems because of its high protein and energy value.

Bakery waste can vary substantially in nutrient content depending on the type of food by-products in the mixture. Bread is high in energy but may require special handling equipment to remove wrappers. Bread meal should be limited to no more than 30 per cent of dry matter intake for pigs. Cookies and crackers can contain high amounts of fat and sugars making them excellent energy sources. Depending on the type of bakery product, salt content can be relatively high and should be taken into account when formulating the liquid feed supplements.

A slurry of brewer’s wet yeast contains about 11-16 per cent dry matter and contains active yeast which may cause further fermentation and frothing during storage. Organic acids should be added to the slurry to reduce the pH and kill the yeast before shipping to the pig farm. Brewer’s wet yeast is an excellent source of high quality, highly digestible protein and contains enzymes and co-factors which benefit pig health and performance. It is generally added at a rate of 2-5 per cent in swine diets but can be used to replace up to 80 per cent of the protein if it is economical. Good growth performance can be achieved when feeding wet brewer’s yeast but the response appears to vary depending on stage of production where it is fed. Feeding it to lactating sows may cause diarrhoea in nursing pigs.

Sugar syrup generally has a dry matter content of approximately 65 per cent and is high in energy but essentially devoid of protein, vitamins and minerals. High sugar content can cause digestive upsets in pigs and therefore, it should be limited to no more than 5 per cent of the diet.


Liquid By-Products from the Ethanol Industry

The production of biofuels, particularly ethanol, is rapidly increasing around the world in response to the need to become less dependent on petroleum and improve the natural environment.

In the US, most of the ethanol is produced by dry-grind ethanol plants using a process shown in Figure 1. Byproducts from dry-grind ethanol plants include wet and dried distiller’s grains, wet and dried distiller’s grains with solubles, modified “wet cake” (a 50 per cent moisture blend of distiller’s grains and solubles), and condensed distiller’s solubles. Approximately 30 per cent of the distiller’s grains with solubles are marketed as a wet by-product for use in dairy operations and beef cattle feedlots located near ethanol plants. The remaining 70 per cent of distiller’s grains with solubles is dried (DDGS) and marketed domestically and internationally for use in dairy, beef, swine and poultry feeds.

Alternatively, wet milling is also used to produce ethanol and this process involves separating components of the corn kernel prior to fermentation as shown in Figure 2. The resulting by-products from wet-milling are corn gluten meal, corn gluten feed, corn germ meal, and condensed fermented extractive. Corn steep water is a liquid by-product that is another attractive ingredient to use in liquid feeding systems for swine.


Figure 1. The dry-grind process of producing ethanol and distiller’s by-products.

Figure 2. The wet-milling process of producing ethanol and corn by-products.

Ethanol plants prefer to market wet by-products due to rising fuel costs and challenges associated with drying the condensed solubles. On the other hand, US pork producers are searching for ways to reduce feed costs due to record high feed ingredient prices. As a result, US pork producers are beginning to use liquid feeding systems to utilize relatively low cost liquid by-products from the ethanol industry.

The two wet corn by-products from the ethanol industry that have been evaluated for use in swine liquid feeding systems are condensed distillers solubles (CDS) and steep water (de Lange et al., 2006). Braun and de Lange (2004) analyzed the nutrient composition of CDS from samples collected from commercial pig farms using liquid feeding systems in 2003 and these results are shown in Table 1. Storing CDS for at least one day on the farm and allowing uncontrolled fermentation resulted in an increase in acetic, propionic and lactic acids, which likely contributed to a slightly lower pH. As shown in Table 2, corn steep water is substantially higher in crude protein, ash, phosphorus and lactic acid than CDS. However, approximately 80 per cent of the phosphorus in corn steep water is bound as phytate and is unusable by the pig unless phytase enzyme is added in improve digestibility. Furthermore, corn steep water is substantially lower in energy than CDS due to the low fat content.

One of the challenges of adding condensed distiller’s solubles to liquid feeds is overcoming the apparent negative effects on palatability (de Lange et al., 2006). However, when the initial pH was standardized to 6 and Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis were used as inoculants, pH declined, and lactic acid and other volatile fatty acids were produced resulting in a more palatable feed (de Lange et al., 2006).

Squire et al. (2005) fed diets containing 0, 7.5, 15.0, and 22.5 per cent CDS to growing pigs and showed that feed palatability was reduced when more than 15 per cent CDS was included in the diet. Feeding the non-fermented CDS diet resulted in reduced growth rate, feed intake, and feed conversion compared to pigs fed the corn-soybean meal control diet, while growth performance of pigs fed the fermented CDS diet was not different from pigs fed the control diet (Table 3). Energy and protein digestibility were reduced when feeding the fermented CDS diet compared to pigs fed the non-fermented CDS and the control diet. However, fat digestibility of the non-fermented and fermented CDS diets was greater than when pigs were fed the control diet. In this study, only pigs on the control and non-fermented CDS diets were fed to slaughter weight. Feeding the non-fermented CDS diet resulted in similar carcass dressing percentage, backfat depth, loin depth, carcass lean yield compared to pigs fed the control diet indicating that acceptable carcass quality can be achieved when feeding liquid non-fermented CDS diets to growing-finishing pigs. It is important to note that loin pH was higher from pigs fed the CDS diet compared to pigs fed the control diet which likely resulted in a trend toward reduced loin drip loss. Reduced drip loss is a significant benefit to meat processors.

Niven et al. (2006) reported results from a preliminary study that showed that growth rate and feed conversion were numerically improved when pigs were fed liquid diets containing 5 per cent corn steep water (SW) but adding 10 per cent SW numerically reduced pig performance. In a larger subsequent study, de Lange et al. (2006) showed that average daily gain, average daily feed intake, and feed:gain were not significantly affected when pigs were fed liquid diets containing 0, 7.5 or 15 per cent phytase treated SW, but adding 22.5 per cent SW resulted in reduced performance (Table 4). No significant effects were observed for dietary inclusion level of SW for carcass weight, loin depth, backfat depth, and lean yield.

In summary, feeding diets containing 15 per cent fermented corn condensed distillers solubles results in comparable growth performance to when typical liquid corn-soybean meal diets are fed, but feeding diets containing 15 per cent non-fermented corn distillers solubles results in reduced performance due to reduced palatability. However, feeding liquid diets containing 15 per cent non-fermented condensed distillers solubles results in similar carcass composition to pigs fed liquid corn-soybean meal diets. Similarly, feeding liquid corn-soybean meal diets containing up to 15 per cent corn steep water treated with phytase results in acceptable growth performance and carcass compostion comparable to feeding a typical liquid corn-soybean meal diets.

Corn condensed distillers solubles and steep water can successfully be used in liquid feeding systems for growing-finishing pigs to achieve satisfactory growth performance and carcass quality at a substantial feed cost savings.

Producción porcina sostenible en tiempos de cambio climático

La industria porcina debe contrarrestar las preocupaciones sobre el cambio climático y proporcionar evidencias que demuestren los esfuerzos que realizamos para minimizar nuestra huella ambiental.

Por: Kelley J. Donham

27 agosto 2020

¿Qué es el cambio climático?

La energía llega a la Tierra desde el Sol, principalmente en forma de radiación de onda corta (luz), y calienta todo el planeta. El calor de la tierra calentada transmite energía en forma de radiación infrarroja. Sin embargo, la radiación infrarroja tiene una longitud de onda mucho más larga, y gran parte de esa energía es absorbida (atrapada) por los gases de efecto invernadero (GEI). Los GEI incluyen el dióxido de carbono (CO2), el vapor de agua (H2O), el metano (CH4) y el óxido nitroso ((N2O). Esa energía atrapada calienta nuestra atmósfera causando el calentamiento global, el principal motivo del cambio climático. Como consecuencia, experimentamos una temperatura más cálida y un clima errático y extremo, con fenómenos como olas de calor, sequías, incendios forestales y tormentas con vientos fuertes y lluvias torrenciales.

Agricultura y cambio climático

En todo el mundo, la agricultura supone un 19% (neto estimado) de los GEI. La producción animal constituye aproximadamente el 40% de la producción agrícola de GEI (Figura 1). Sin embargo, los dos principales gases resultantes de la producción animal (CH4 y N2O) absorben mucha más energía que el CO2 (CH4, 32 y N2O, 280 veces más que el CO2, respectivamente). La sociedad y los ecologistas critican a la agricultura por tener un efecto negativo en el medio ambiente. Nuestra industria necesita contrarrestar estas preocupaciones y proporcionar evidencias que demuestren los esfuerzos que realizamos para minimizar nuestra huella ambiental. Además, nuestra industria necesita minimizar los actuales y futuros efectos del cambio climático en la productividad y la rentabilidad. Este artículo revisa brevemente los GEI emitidos en la producción porcina, qué efectos tiene el calentamiento global en la producción, cómo se pueden mitigar las emisiones y cómo la gestión de las emisiones puede contribuir a los resultados económicos.

Figura 1. Emisiones totales de gases de efecto invernadero de EE.UU. por sector económico en 2017. Fuente: U.S. EPA.

Producción porcina y cambio climático

¿Cuáles son los principales efectos negativos del cambio climático y el calentamiento global en la producción porcina?

  1. Temperaturas más cálidas provocan:

    1. menor tasa de fertilidad en cerdas;

    2. en el engorde, el exceso de calor reduce el consumo de pienso y, por lo tanto, disminuye la tasa de crecimiento;

    3. un clima más cálido mejora la supervivencia de plagas de insectos que pueden propagar enfermedades (por ejemplo, moscas, piojos, etc.);

    4. una mayor incidencia de enfermedades en una explotación porcina aumenta los costes veterinarios y de medicación.

  2. El cambio climático puede provocar sequías y una menor disponibilidad de agua.

  3. Aumento de los costes de producción debido a:

    1. incremento del gasto energético para enfriamiento y ventilación;

    2. aumento del coste de la proteína y energía del pienso debido a la reducción de las cosechas por el clima extremo.

¿Cuáles son las fuentes de GEI asociadas con la producción porcina?

Las principales fuentes de GEI agrícolas (alrededor del 40%) provienen del suelo durante la producción de cultivos. Aproximadamente el 60% de los GEI agrícolas proviene de la ganadería. El metano procede de la digestión de los rumiantes y de la digestión anaeróbica de los purines porcinos y el N2O de cambios microbianos y atmosféricos del nitrógeno de los excrementos animales emitidos desde las balsas o tras su aplicación al suelo.

Figura 2. Tapar balsa para recoger el metano como fuente de energía. Fuente: Roslin LLC.

¿Cómo pueden los productores porcinos minimizar la emisión de GEI y los efectos negativos en la producción?

  1. Diseñando dietas bajas en proteína con biodisponibilidad de aminoácidos (nutrólogos porcinos ya trabajan en ello).

  2. Gestionando los purines como recursos valiosos para reducir emisiones.

    1. Tapar lagunas para recoger el metano como fuente de energía (Figura 2).

    2. Solo aplicar en el suelo agrícola la cantidad de estiércol que el cultivo necesite.

  3. En la producción de maíz y soja se debe labrar mínimamente o en absoluto la tierra y cubrir los cultivos para mantener el nitrógeno en el suelo y disponible para los cultivos.

  4. Utilizando los subproductos de la producción de bioetanol como componente de la dieta.

  5. Plantando árboles o pastos autóctonos alrededor de la zona de producción para crear barreras contra el viento y zonas de sombra, que también absorberán el CO2.

¿Qué opciones de manejo existen para utilizar menos energía y combatir el clima extremo?

  1. Reformar y construir nuevas instalaciones:

    1. Para la ventilación, considerar el uso de ventiladores centrífugos en lugar de axiales donde sea posible, ya que son más eficientes, funcionan mejor contra fuerzas externas del viento y tienen un mantenimiento fácil;

    2. Aumentar la resistencia estructural y el aislamiento de las instalaciones para soportar vientos más fuertes y manejar temperaturas extremas;

    3. Utilizar luz natural cuando sea posible y iluminación LED cuando se necesite luz artificial.

  2. Utilizar cajas nido en maternidad para mantener aún más baja la temperatura general de la instalación.

  3. Instalar paneles solares para uso energético (Figura 3).

  4. Considerar realizar la fase de acabado en outdoor de forma total o parcialmente para ahorrar energía.

Figura 3. Instalación de sistemas eléctricos solares en explotaciones porcinas Fuente: Acevedo, R. Universidad de Minnesota.

¿A qué problemas se enfrentarán los productores con las regulaciones sobre el cambio climático y qué incentivos recibirán por reducir los GEI?

En el futuro, es probable que las empresas tengan que pagar por los GEI que emiten. Además, posiblemente se recompensen las acciones que reduzcan los GEI y/o capten carbono. Climate Trust es una organización que planifica y gestiona programas para que las empresas reduzcan su huella de carbono. Plantean las dos siguientes líneas generales para reducir las emisiones y promover sus posibilidades de captar carbono.

  • Aumentar el carbono en el suelo: prácticas como el compostaje, el carbón vegetal y la gestión de pastos y ganado, generan más biomasa en el suelo, no solo mejorando su calidad,en términos como fertilidad y capacidad de retención de agua, sino también captando carbono.

  • Cambios en la gestión de fertilizantes: cambios en la cantidad, momento, lugar y tipo de fertilizante podrían recibir compensaciones de carbono si se reducen las emisiones de GEI.

Resumen

El cambio climático es una realidad y causa el calentamiento global, que desafía la sostenibilidad de la producción porcina. Nos podemos enfrentar a los problemas si los reconocemos y comprendemos. Un estudio en profundidad de los métodos presentados en este artículo junto con su planificación e incorporación en el plan de gestión de la empresa ayudará a generar una imagen pública positiva para una industria sostenible a largo plazo.

Emisiones totales de gases de efecto invernadero de EE.UU. por sector económico en 2017. Fuente: U.S. EPA.

Emisiones totales de gases de efecto invernadero de EE.UU. por sector económico en 2017. Fuente: U.S. EPA.